|
|
|
a study by |
|
Bruce Cornet, Ph.D. |
|
Formerly with NIDS |
|
|
|
|
Dr. Ellen Crystall claims in her 1991 book,
Silent Invasion, that she detected evidence for an underground alien base
near Pine Bush, NY. |
|
In 1992, Bruce Cornet began a three year, 200
square mile geologic mapping project in the Wallkill River Valley of New
York State in order to test her hypothesis. |
|
Magnetic measurements were made at 1,800
locations or stations within the mapping area. |
|
Several maps were generated which show
underground geologic features, and various types of magnetic anomalies. |
|
Some of these anomalies appeared to be unnatural
and technologically based. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three notable anomalies have been observed over
and around the triangular magnetic array: |
|
1. A very large triangular craft was observed
hovering directly over the array (and cemetery) one evening. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. The ground around the magnetic source array
is sometimes unusually warm – enough so that it rapidly melted snow banks
only along the road in front of the cemetery. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pictures taken by Phil Martin in March 1994. |
|
3. Witnesses (the Martins) observed a tracking
beam of light arising from between the three magnetic sources, which
tracked a low flying commercial airliner as it passed over the cemetery,
and then disappeared as quickly as it appeared. |
|
|
|
|
|
Strange sounds and rapid drops in air
temperature have been reported at the cemetery and near the transmitter
array. |
|
the author has experienced such drops in
temperature and popping sound (cf. vacuum seal being broken) coming from
the magnetic transmitter located at the cemetery entrance. |
|
Sue Mann reported feeling vibrations and a
distinct humming coming out of the ground within the cemetery one night. |
|
Plants and animals have grown or behaved
strangely in and around the cemetery and magnetic sources – including
plants that grew downwards and towards one source, and worms/insects that
allegedly glowed at night. |
|
|
|
|
Location of magnetic source (transmitter) next
to Beth Hillel Cemetery fence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As far as being a signal, for it to transmit
into space it needs to be electromagnetic. The SETI definition of signal is
a very narrow-band (1 Hz or less) CW signal detected at any given microwave
frequency. |
|
Pulsed magnetic fields can be used to focus
particle beams and electromagnetic fields, and that theory is certainly
more plausible than a magnetic transmitter. |
|
The strength of the signals detected implies
artificiality more than regular pulses or geographic spacing. |
|
The three equilaterally spaced magnetic sources
could be part of a beam focusing system.
With three magnets, a beam of charged particles can be steered and
pointed into space. Four or more
magnets could be used, but controlling them gets complicated. |
|
|
|
|
Therefore, the three magnetic anomalies detected
are probably not actual signal beams.
Rather, they are indirect evidence that an unknown centrally-located
signal (between the three magnetic sources) was being generated when the
magnetic spikes were detected. In
support of that interpretation, the Martins saw a beam of light originating
from the cemetery near that central location. |
|
As for the beam going through solid rock, the
particles would need to be very tiny and energetic, like neutrinos or
weakly interacting dark matter. |
|
|
|
|
If an active alien transmitter exists
underground, and sends signals out into space from time to time, it
represents a unique opportunity for monitoring and study. |
|
All three magnetic transmitters detected with a Precession
Proton Magnetometer are located on private property just outside a local
cemetery (prior to 2005). |
|
A seismic survey might be able to detect the
depth of the devices producing the magnetic signals, as well as their sizes
and shapes. |
|
|
|
|
Monitoring equipment could be positioned at each
magnetic source location so that a continuous record of activity can be
made and studied. |
|
Determining the characteristics of the magnetic
fields focusing the signal, and the type of carrier beam (e.g. charged
particles, neutrinos, weakly interacting dark matter, etc.) could help us
understand why SETI has been unsuccessful in detecting ETI communications. |
|
If this is alien technology, it means ET is
already here and transmitting data to a distant location in space (shades
of the movie, The Arrival ). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why is this technology located underground? |
|
Camouflage and inaccessibility. OR |
|
An ET probe arrived here long ago and landed on
an island in a shallow Ordovician sea.
It arrived on Earth 100 million years after the beginning of the
Cambrian life explosion. It was
gradually buried in marine mud as sea level rose. With time and continued burial the enclosing muds were turned
into rock. Erosion and glaciation
have nearly exposed the probe, and it is trying to signal ‘home’. |
|
If this is a buried probe, why is it
transmitting today? |
|
It may contain a long-lived power source, have
been engineered and designed to seek out planets with primitive life, and
transmit signals when it detected the evolution of intelligent life. |
|
Triangular craft are commonly spotted flying
over the area, and some stop and hover directly over the buried probe as if
drawn to its beacon. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On 8-9 November 2007 the History Channel brought
magnetometers and a ground penetrating radar system to the location of the
anomalous magnetic signals. |
|
The fence around the Beth Hillel cemetery had
been extended west and south. It now encloses the tree and signal source
that had been outside the cemetery fence before 2005. |
|
They discovered that the large tree next to the
signal source was magnetized: 1700 milligauss, compared to 55 milligauss
background level. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magnetic readings next to the cemetery were
fluctuating in three different directions simultaneously. |
|
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) along the south
side of the cemetery encountered a buried object seven feet below the
surface, surrounded by Ordovician grit and shales of the Austin Glen
Formation (450 mya) – exactly where Cornet’s hypothesis predicted it would
be found. |
|
The object is more than 17 feet thick. |
|
GPR data extends only down to 27 feet, and does
not show the bottom of the object, nor what it is resting on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes